Trip to Puerto Rico!

                                    View from haflway up the mountain at El Yunque National Forest in Puerto Rico.

                                    View from haflway up the mountain at El Yunque National Forest in Puerto Rico.

I spent the entire second week of July traveling to Puerto Rico for the first time! It was incredible and I’m going to document and reflect here.

I was visiting a friend who is on a Watson Fellowship and currently living in San Juan. We were joined by two other deeply close friends of ours. I hadn’t seen any of them in the entire year since we graduated college, and we all have big life shifts coming up. Host friend’s Watson is ending and they’re coming back to the United States and beginning the job hunt. Another friend just finished their year as a paralegal and has been accepted into the prestigious Iowa Creative Writing program. The final friend just finished a Calculus class because she’s a total badass, is getting ready to give notice to her first post-grad job, and is letting herself be open to maybe moving!

And I just finished my six-month AmeriCorps job, drove a U-HAUL 14 hours out of Boston, have no idea what I’m doing with my life, would like to pursue financial independence, and desperately needed this vacation. So it was hectic, but ultimately excellent, timing.

                                                The ocean and coral rocks at a small beach where I went (!) cliff diving 

                                                The ocean and coral rocks at a small beach where I went (!) cliff diving 

Yes, obviously we went to the beach. The beaches are absolutely stunning. But here is the only beach picture I’m including:

Which I say because I don’t just want to share my experience as a tourist. I want to share what I was able to learn and observe from being in Puerto Rico (mostly in San Juan, specifically.) A lot of times I read travel blog posts that go in depth about the place and its features, but hardly mention the people who actually live there full-time. So I want to use this as a space to share the adventures I had and also discuss some issues I saw affecting the people who call that place home. 

Puerto Rican Independence

Puerto Rico is essentially an occupied colony of the United States. Residents have American citizenship but no representation in the federal government and no ability to make financial or other national decisions without dictation from the U.S.

My friends and I were trying to push each other and ourselves to confront our own complicity in the U.S. imperialist occupation of Puerto Rico. Here is a place where the American government benefits while not suffering repercussions of their actions on foreign soil; that is exploitation. Puerto Ricans don’t have a voice in Congress; that is undemocratic.

For some Puerto Ricans, the solution to this is statehood. And I respect that, but I fundamentally believe that the United States has an obligation to return colonial territories to their pre-occupied state. In the case of Puerto Rico, that would mean granting Puerto Rico complete independence and autonomy, formal apologies for environmental damage, and reparations for forcing the country from an agrarian to industrial economy and having it tank. I think a public recognition of the dangerous reproductive experiments performed on Puerto Rican women by U.S. corporations is needed as well

         The symbol of the Puerto Rican flag in black and white representing independence. 

         The symbol of the Puerto Rican flag in black and white representing independence. 

Having entities that are disconnected from a place, its people, and its land is so harmful. The unaffected can’t determine the state of the affected. That’s not democratic or sustainable. Puerto Rican land belongs to Puerto Ricans and they are the best equipped to take care of it and its affairs.

Environmental (in) Justice in Puerto Rico

One place I wanted to visit was the island of Vieques. A lot of people know this spot because of its famous bioluminescent bays, but lesser known on the island is the half-century worth of hazardous waste created by the U.S. military.

From 1941 to 2003 the U.S. Navy operated a training base on the eastside of the island Vieques and a bomb dumping zone on the west side. The Navy has admitted to testing everything from Agent Orange to nuclear bomb deployment during its sixty-two year stay on the island. As one could easily predict, the residents of Vieques have experienced health issues from exposure due to environmental hazards. Their water has been contaminated from Naval wastewater and the soil and vegetation now contains dangerous levels of heavy metals. Residents have recorded abnormally high rates of cancer, hypertension, heart disease, and other health concerns. The Navy claims there is no connection between the health issues and their presence on the island, despite scientific conclusions of a definitive correlation.

In 2010 a U.S. District Court Judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit brought by 7,000 residents of Vieques on the basis that the U.S. government has immunity from damage resulting from its military. The class action is now pursuing a case against the Department of Defense and the “Rothman’s Vieques Recovery and Development Act” (2011) has been brought forth in Congress.

While I researched Vieques more extensively for a paper I wrote in college, I sourced my summary for this post from this article on the Navy’s role in the health crisis. I highly recommend reading it.

And you can read more about the U.S. military’s role in global environmental pollution in a series of curated essays by Professor H. Partricia Hynes. Vieques is casestudied in detail.
 

Pollution Elsewhere + Environmental Justice Art

At El Museo De Las Americas (The Museum of the Americas) I had the opportunity to view and engage with Herminio Rodríguez’ installation “Contaminados.” It is a series of portraits depicting everyday life and resistance of individuals and groups covered in ash, representing the coal pollution experienced by the communities of Peñuelas and Guayama. You can read about the pollution here, but essentially two low-income towns on the southside of Puerto Rico are laden with contaminants from the nearby AES power plant and “Peñuelas Technology Park” industrial dump. The ash that coats the towns has deep effects on quality of life, but little is being done to reduce the damage inflicted on these communities.

Some of the portraits and the artist’s project summary in English can be viewed here.

You can read a piece in Spanish about “Contaminados” here.

 The photos were in black and white, most taken up close, and all were striking and provocative. Some of my favorite individual portraits included one of a pregnant womxn whose womb was covered in ash, and one of a parent feeding their child a spoonful of ash with their cereal.  I love art like this because
a) I am a sucker for portraits.
b) It displays the common and places it on a pedestal that we all need to be seeing and thinking about.

I think it’s neat that famous people like bands and actresses were photographed for the project, seemingly to heighten awareness about it, but the power of the project is in the photos of residents of the ash-ridden towns. It is their narratives that are worthy of the attention. It is their stories that make the art.

I think social practice art, particularly environmental justice artistry, holds incredible potential and implications. Art is an integral part of the revolution and, as a more mission-driven activist, I have to remind myself of this. It was important for me to see this project when I was in Puerto Rico. I had read about the pollution sites at Vieques, but it was necessary for me to bear witness to other places and people who continually deal with environmental pollution.

Environmental justice art does two things, I think:
a) It portrays issues in an accessible and provoking way, often to large audiences.
b) When done right, it uplifts the narratives of the most affected, and financially contributes to their activism.

I don’t know if artist Rodríguez gave profits from this installation to the residents he photographed, but I hope so. As much as I loved this installation, I don’t love that these people have been poisoned every single day for generations. The attention art can gather only goes so far as to inspire. We have to take that inspiration and turn it into action.

El Yunque and the National Park System

Myself, standing under a waterfall in El Yunque National Forest. It was an incredible, life-changing experience. 

Myself, standing under a waterfall in El Yunque National Forest. It was an incredible, life-changing experience. 

On our vacation we also went to El Yunque, the federally owned and operated national park in Puerto Rico. I have a lot of feelings about the existence and maintenance of national parks, places that removed indigenous communities for the sake of ‘preservation and enjoyment,’ but for now I’ll leave it here with the notion that yes, I had a wonderful time in El Yunque, but I wondered if it was at the expense of the Taino people who named the region.

Ending Thoughts

Of course on my vacation I relaxed, soaked up the Sun, spent time at the ocean, and enjoyed eating good food and making memories with my friends. But I was highly conscious of the political and environmental realities of the place I was in. I think this is an essential best practice for all of us who love to wander. It’s easy when you’ve uprooted yourself to feel the whole world is groundless. But everywhere we go, there is indeed ground beneath our feet and people who have relationships with the land we walk upon.

I was in a place that was colonized by the Spanish and then handed over to the United States in 1898. Its people were not considered citizens until 1917 and today still are deprived the democratic right to vote for their federally elected officials. The U.S. Navy occupied part of the island and polluted its population by poisoning the water and soil. U.S. owned and influenced companies continue to poison small communities for the sake of energy and profit production, because the health and safety of poor people is considered inconsequential. There on the island exists a beautiful and important national park, that is maintained by the same government that denies its citizens their own rights and regulates access to the area from the very people that live there. And I know there’s more complicated histories that I couldn’t get a sense of because I was only there for a week and I’m nothing of an expert.

Visiting Puerto Rico as a white American, I was trying to be conscious about my passive and active actions, their implications, and their impact. I felt, and feel, really helpless in my complicity in colonial imperialist institutions as this well-meaning tourist. My presence alone forced people to defer to me in certain ways, to accommodate the fact that I don’t speak Spanish, it used my dollars to reinforce the importance of the tourist industry.
 

                                          Street art seen on a walk to Viejo San Juan.

                                          Street art seen on a walk to Viejo San Juan.

I really struggle with figuring out what I can do, even though I know there are things to be done.

I think education and research in an attempt to understand a place is so critical. I really do recommend reading about the places you go and, better yet, talking to people to learn about their experiences. I also think that is not enough. As this white American who can vote, whose voice is recognized by my government, I have to use that voice to amplify the desires of those who don’t have that power.

With this in mind, these are the things I want to be held accountable to. I had the privilege to take this vacation, and I have the responsibility to not be the only person who benefits from my experience:

Next Steps for Now:

-Continue to try and reduce my shitty tourist footprint by visiting places where people I know are living, buying groceries cooking in, spending money at locally owned business (preferably owned by people of color, and ideally by womxn of color.)
-Contact my Congress people to advocate for Puerto Rican Independence.
-Campaign for the closure of the industries polluting Peñuelas and Guayama.
-Campaign for the courts to recognize the U.S. Navy's responsibility for causing the Vieques health crisis.
-As soon as I have some spare money, financially support Puerto Rican activism, and in the meantime boost it on my platforms. (Taking suggestions for organizations you know and trust!)
-Educate friends/family/strangers on the economic crisis and how the U.S. forced P.R. into defaulting on their debt.
-Learn more about what steps people are asking imperial colonists to take in order to decolonize our personal relationships and ways of life.

I’m going to check back in about these steps with an update and reflection by Aug. 31st. So look forward to that and, of course, feedback and thoughts is always welcome.

 

Fairy Femmes and Mermaid Marills

I’m hooked to Pokémon Go. I played it the entire time I was in Puerto Rico. My friends would be staring at street murals and I would be half a block back shouting up “I’ve just got to get this Houndour!”

I did play a lot when the game first premiered last year and then it sort of fizzled out for me, but I’ve recommitted with a new fervor and intensity.

The friend I was visiting in Puerto Rico is at level 34 and they taught me a lot for which I am seriously grateful. We went on my first raid together, we took my first gym together, I learned about the PokeGenie app. All gamechangers. I’m going to share pieces of these gamechangers, but first, I just want to talk about all my PokeFeels.

Fantasies and Feelings

·         I love Fairy Pokémon so much. The most. Forever and always. I’ve always thought Fairy types are the most femme of them all. As a young child who was placed in the ‘girl’ box, I was drawn to Fairy types from the jump and they were my entrance to Pokémon. Jigglypuff and Clefairy, these are my girls. But I’ve also always felt that Fairy types are made weaker in-game and that feels discriminatory and icky to me.

·         If I were a Pokémon, it would be Marill. Water-Fairy types for the win. (#femmescorpiorising.) I mean, they’re basically mermaids. Azumarill is a fat perfect mermaid. You can’t tell me otherwise.

·         Speaking of water fairy types, the actual mermaid one, Primarina freaks me out. I can't do mermaid meets clown. The only scarier Pokémon is Mr. Mime.

·         On a different note, every queer person I know is Team Mystic. Crowd poll—is this true for you too? Why are all us gays into Mystic?

·         Whenever I’m walking around playing Pokemon Go as my icon KikiEPearl, a masculine all-blue wearing BAMF, I picture my best self out in the streets catching ‘em all: long skirt, Doc Martens, lips and nails that could kill a man, etc.

Strategies

·         If you’re me, your main strategy is to collect every Fairy and Water type you ever stumble upon. No idea the in-game merits of this but it makes my heart warm and that’s what it’s all about. Cheers.

·         A real-life tactic that is crucial for me are depression walks. When I’m trying to coax myself out of my bed and then out of my house, I’ll open Pokemon Go and then try to walk around until I hatch a 2K egg. It may sound like a little thing, but it has pushed me significantly and I am appreciative.

·         My friend uses PokeGenie to find out the percentage of their pokemon and then names them that percentage so they can keep track. So that’s a neat trick I suggest.

·         I can never figure out what things are for so my new strategy for this in PokemonGo is to just click things. Like if you click the berries twice, it tells you what they do. Revelationary!

·         Other things I’ve recently found out after playing for a full year that maybe you might not know too: clicking the nearby Pokemon helps you track them, click your icon to see the gyms you’ve been to, every gym is now a Pokestop too, the “Appraise” feature will tell you if your pokemon is a wonder and that is a good thing!

·         Get a beloved group together and take gyms with each other while looking and feeling good just for you. The other day I was at a local fair and walked up to a raid and it was some intense AMAB dudes who didn’t make eye contact but only glanced up from their screens to look at my body. No one wants to play in that environment! So bring your own group to have a good time, reassure you that you belong, and have guaranteed backup against catcalling.

·         I’ve heard a rumor that if you wear the Magicarp hat you’re more likely to get a shiny Magicarp (those are the ones that turn into red Gyrados).

·         This one is obvious, but go to richer neighborhoods because classism makes Pokestops scarce in a lot of poor places. Game imitates life.

·         Lastly, play for you. It’s okay to fumble around; you’re still a worthwhile player. As a ‘girl,’ I’ve always felt if I didn’t get it right away, I couldn’t do it. And games can be really intimidating! But you can do it, there is no right or wrong, don’t listen to the mansplainers, and you will figure it all out. Now go catch ‘em all!

wSakura

Here is my Espeon looking cute. (I kept Sakura because that’s how you get Espeons and I’m still obsessed with Naruto. I put (w) in front of the names of all my wonders to keep track A-Z.)

7.14.17 Friday Round Up

Welcome to Friday Roundup, where I share relevant things that came across my Internet during the past week, with you, my deserving and glorious readers. This series is inspired by Autostraddle's "Saw This, Thought of You" segment that is very worth reading too.

Welcome back to another semi-regular segment of Friday Round Up. This week I have links on links.

  • In doing research for an upcoming post on summer skin routines, I’ve finally learned what cold cream is. Are we here for it or nah?
     
  • I spent fifteen hours straight traveling this week by way of two planes and a train. I was so exhausted and thirsty by the end I never wanted to see another human being again. Don’t be me and even when traveling in a frenzied hurry, practice these travel tips. And, for the love of g-d, bring a Nalgene.
     
  • I still really really want silver hair, as demonstrated by my excessive pinning. But I don’t want to (read: can’t) pay $500 to have it done. Maybe you have this problem too?
     
  • I think this 2014 piece on environmentalism and inaccessibility from Marc Bamuthi Joseph pairs nicely with EF's posts from earlier this week. 
     
  • I’m staying in my mom’s house currently and last night we went out to dinner with some of her friends and it was a painful evening in practicing how to have awkward conversations with real adults when you’re unemployed and very mentally ill. It was hard not to dodge uncomfortable questions by whipping some of these facts out.
     
  • Also in my mom’s house, a Magic Bullet as seen on early 2000s infomercials. Do we buy in to this decades old hype? I’ll post an insta smoothie shot and you can lmk.
     

That’s it ya’ll. I don’t have to say stay tuned for environmentalism and feminism foundation posts because they went up this week! Read ‘em and share your comments!

How were your weeks? What wild things did you find on the Interwebs, cool cats?

(Femme)inism 101

 

My environmentalism post was a beast so I promise to make this introduction to the importance of feminism more brief. Also I’ve tried to write this post like four times and it just keeps ending in rants, so I’m going to challenge myself to just get the basics out there.

The goals of this post are to:

1.     Demystify feminism a bit if you’re not familiar with it. 

2.    Explain why this blog has a femme-centric approach to environmentalism.

3.    Question what kind of content you as a reader would like to see in regards to environmental, feminist,          and ecofeminist issues.         

So, let’s get some definitions, let’s get on the same page, and let’s go.

Definitions:

Feminism—a sociopolitical movement that combats sexism, the cisheteropatriarchy, and the devaluing of femme people and labor. 

Femme--for the purposes of this blog, a  femme is someone who identifies with the word femme. I’m not the identity police so do what you will. (Autostraddle did a really good roundtable on the word and its origins in Black queer communities if you want to read more!)

AFAB—assigned female at birth; a doctor looked at this person and said ‘that is a girl.’ AFAB people commonly have some combination of a uterus/clitoris/vulva, but not always, and that says nothing about their gender identity.

AMAB—assigned male at birth; a doctor looked at this person and said ‘that is a boy.’ AMAB commonly have some combination of a penis and testicles, but not always, and that says nothing about their gender identity. 

Woman—someone who identifies with the gender identity of woman; can have any sort of genitalia; can be AFAB or AMAB.

Man—someone who identifies with the gender identity of man; can have any sort of genitalia; can be AFAB or AMAB.

Non-binary person—someone who does not identify as either a man or woman.

Cisgender—someone who identifies with the gender they were assigned at birth; an AMAB person who identifies as a man and an AFAB person who identifies as a woman.

Transgender—someone who does not identify with the gender they were assigned at birth.

Misogyny--gendered oppression that holds masculinity as superior to femininity; perceives femininity as weakness and threatens its existence with violence.

Transmisogyny—the specific form of oppression experienced by trans women, non-binary femmes, and some AFAB people.

Misogynoir—the specific form of oppression experienced by Black women and femmes.

Disclaimer: Gender is really personal and we are all allowed to relate differently to words, to ideas, to the process of discovering who we are. Terms are only so helpful; people connectto them in many different ways, and sometimes don’t fuck with them at all. Take the words that feel good to heart, challenge those that don’t. Call people in, care about their personhood.

So, if everyone experiences gender really differently and has different feelings about words, then why celebrate femmehood? Why is that good for everyone?

Well, folks, even though people experience gender differently, the existence of gendered oppression affects everyone—definitely some more than others. When we think about the most affected--queer women, AMAB femmes, trans women, trans women of color—there is so much violence and hatred directed at these identities. Celebrating them becomes an act of resilience. To this day I work through my own internalized sexism and part of what helps me do that is owning the parts of myself the world would like me to be ashamed of. It was revolutionary for me when I began to feel my own fragility as power. I want to be unapologetic in my femmehood—meaning my embodiment of my self-indulgence, empathy, and love for community. Being femme, for me, is these things and so much more. It’s glitter, wearing skirts when it’s dangerous, having sharp nails ready to be used against catcallers, loving fat people and how they look, fighting for my sisters in all forms, and still more. And because people claim this identity in diverse and multifaceted ways, I want this blog to be a place that celebrates all expressions of femme identity and its reclamation. Especially by fat femmes, disabled femmes, femmes of color, genderqueer femmes, poor femmes and all the femmes who rep the identity among their many others.

This is a lot to digest and I want it to be more of the start of a conversation rather than a single piece, so I’ll end with some bullets on some femme things I want to explore here and please continue your lists in the comments below:

Femme things near and dear to me:

1.      Expectations of womanhood and performativity
2.     Navigating consumption culture as a perceived consumable object
3.     The necessity of intersectional feminism
4.     Acknowledgement of us saavy poor femmes who do it better on a budget
5.     The empowerment of women and femmes in environmentalism aka ecofeminism
6.     The empowerment of women and femmes and especially women + femmes of color into outdoors-y,             camping, hiking, nature survivalist spaces that are dominated by white men. (Isn’t the dream just                   femmes with power tools building greenhouses on the farm?)
7.      Power of the unacknowledged emotional labor demanded of femmes
8.     Mermaids. Everything mermaids forever

I am femme and proud, I am open to learning and expanding, I will dedicate my life to honoring the importance of femmes and recording here all our intricate and nuanced existences. I want to hear your thoughts.

 

Environmentalism 101

If we are to ground this blog in a specific understanding of environmentalism, one that is in constant flux but holds to certain values, we might as well begin at the beginning. What are we talking about when we say “environmentalism,” “environmental justice,” and the “environmental movement?” This blog post doesn’t answer these questions, that’s for this community, but it does position us with an understanding of today’s environmentalist landscape to continue the conversation.

I think many people would say that the environmental movement in the United States was started by Richard Nixon in the 1970s. And it’s true, he created the EPA and passed the Clean Water and Air Acts. Because he was a Republican, he made “saving the Earth” his left-leaning initiative that would please both sides of the aisle. (But Earth doesn’t need #whitesaviorism.) So it is fair to say that Nixon was a key player in the beginning of the environmental political movement in the United States.

But environmentalism was not birthed by Nixon or neighborhood cleanups in the suburbs. Doing things to support the Earth and its environments did not begin with a political campaign in the 20th century.

Urban gardening as a community tool for survival has existed in this country since Black families escaped southern terrorism by fleeing north to cities and creating intricate dependent networks of food growing and sharing.

Subsistence living and symbiotic ways of engaging with the land have been practiced by indigenous people on this land since before settler-colonialism and the invention of the nation-state here.

Taking the bus, reusing items, and having little tech are all sustainable practices that poor people have done out of necessity since always.

People today want to talk climate change. Which is good, we should. It is an issue that is going to actively affect us all in the next 5-20 years in ways we can’t even totally anticipate. But when we have these conversations, we must recognize that ‘first-world’ country white middle-class and up inhabitants are buffered from the effects of climate change. While it surely will affect us all in the near future, climate change is actively affecting indigenous people, residents of the global south, and poor communities right now. With no buffer zone, these people face the brunt of the current environmental burden.

These are the same people who live the most sustainably. Poor people have significantly lower carbon footprints that others. And this makes since—when you take public transportation, don’t travel widely, own few things, shop secondhand, reuse plastic bags and everything else your grandmother’s savvy taught you, you are working significantly to save the Earth. But rarely do those people and those acts go recognized.

This is why I think top-down only solutions to climate change are doomed. But let me take a step back and define the environmental schools of “Top-Down” and “Bottom Up” and their divides.

Top-Down environmental solutions utilize technology and wide-scale legislative, commercial, and cultural shifts to decrease consumption, carbon emissions, and climate change effects. Things like carbon taxation, regulatory laws, and Carbon Neutral City campaigns are examples of top-down environmental strategy. One thing that often crops up with top-down thinking is that it is up to “first-world” countries to decide and spread protocol change to the rest of the world. Things like the Paris Accords are top-down global strategy to combat climate change.

The belief that it is up to the United States and Europe to create and implement the global solution is flawed because these are the same countries who disproportionately cause the effects of climate change. Furthermore, they are largely responsible for emissions created by other parts of the world. For instance, China, because of its rapid industrialization has some serious carbon emissions—we’ve all seen the photos of the smog—and is ‘running behind’ in greenification. But the industrial demands placed on China are due to demands from the United States and European consumers’ and created largely by foreign companies who manufacture there for cheaper and more exploited labor.

Top down thinkers want to keep their cake and eat it too. We can’t save the earth and continue to live the way we do. Uncomfortable sacrifices, especially on the wealthy’s way of life, is a brutal reality. There’s just no if, ands, or buts about it. If the entire world consumed at the rate of the average middle class American family, we would need four Earths to have enough resources to support consumption. But we only have one Earth. So why are we pushing for third world countries to develop and be like us? It’s simply not sustainable. Technology is not going to save us. The cost of producing that tech in and of itself is a drain of resources. We cannot rely on the policymakers and corporate entities who got us into this mess to get us out of this mess.

Which is not to say that things like the Paris Accords are bad. They’re not, they are strong goals and they make an important statement. However, we cannot reduce the import of bottom-up environmental change as well.

Bottom-up environmental efforts are those that operate from grassroots-level actions to effect change. They’re the actions we take as individuals and communities to build the Earth we want to live on that everyone can enjoy.

Things like Boston’s Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative are examples of impactful grassroots environmental change. The continued practice of interconnecting community gardens that create food sovereignty, foster knowledge sharing, and build competent independent communities who could feasible survive an environmental disaster.

Land reclamation, both of indigenous territory and, in places like Detroit, of formerly corporate land, both redistributes resources and allows intimate person-nature connections. Giving land to those who are closest to it fosters a way of interacting with the land that ensures the mutual gain of both the land and its inhabitants. This idea can be summed up as the “you wouldn’t pollute your own backyard” concept.

Not accumulating trash, rallying your farmers’ markets to accept EBT (and then making the market actually inviting to low-income people), transitioning into smaller housing, valuing keeping your phones and computers for more than five years—these are also examples of bottom-up environmental efforts. These actions may be less flashy than the Accords, they take hard work, sacrifice, and collaborative effort, but they will have just as strong an impact.

A bottom-up framework is inclusive, brings marginal experience to center, and prioritizes the voices and goals of those most affected by problems in creating solutions. Whereas top-down thinkers are often critiqued for being disconnected, bottom-up thinkers are engaged and working from the heart of issues. Bottom-up environmentalism must work alongside anti-racist, pro-indigenous sovereignty, class-confronting, gender equality movements in order to be effective. But unfortunately, we have a ways to go before this intersectional bottoms-up environmentalism is the norm.

Nixon-era mainstream environmentalism prioritized cleaning up the water and air in middle class neighborhoods, praising the creation of the Clean Water + Air Acts, while ignoring environmental issues that were harming society’s most vulnerable. Environmentalism today cannot continue to overlook the issues affecting the least protected communities. Again, these are the communities made of the very people leaving the smallest carbon footprint and are least responsible for our present state. Top-down theorists and policymakers need to confront the reality that the onus is on us—we have made the greatest mistakes and instead of dictating to “third-world countries” or urban communities what they need to be doing, we need to be prioritizing altering our own consumption patterns and modes of operating. You can’t demand someone wash their hands when there’s dirt on your own. We—and I say we as a class-ascending white person—need to be buying less, living close to where we work while actively resisting gentrification, growing our own food, repurposing things—doing a lot of things that poor/migrant/disabled+ marginalized to the point of squeezing folks already do. And we need to be listening to the solutions of those who already live sustainably. The knowledge already exists. It’s been silenced through oppression, colonialism, imperialism, and capitalism, but those who know it are the experts. And we need to be paying attention to what these most affected folks are saying. Until then, efforts against climate change will not be equitable and therefore not actually useful in ‘saving’ the world.